What it does
Rock mass classifications put numbers on how blocky, rough, weathered, wet and stressed a rock mass is. This page does the arithmetic for the three most used ones, with ratings that you read from the published tables:
- RQD from a core run (Deere): type the run length and the lengths of the core pieces in order. The page adds up the sound pieces 10 cm or longer (you can change the cut-off), gives RQD as a percentage of the run, the core recovery, and a drawing of the run with counted pieces dark, short ones light and lost core dashed.
- Q-system (Barton and others): Q = (RQD/Jn) × (Jr/Ja) × (Jw/SRF). The three quotients stand for relative block size, shear strength between blocks and active stress. RQD can come from the core run or be typed; below 10 it is taken as 10, as Barton advises (you can switch that off). Q′ (without the water and stress terms) is shown too.
- RMR (Bieniawski 1989): the sum of five ratings (intact rock strength, RQD, joint spacing, joint condition, groundwater) plus an orientation adjustment that is zero or negative.
- Correlation and GSI: RMR = A ln Q + B with A and B you can change (Bieniawski’s 9 and 44 to start), both ways, with a chart; GSI ≈ RMR89 with dry groundwater − 5, and GSI ≈ A ln Q′ + B.
The rating tables are not included. Each input has a one-line reminder of what it describes; take the value from the original papers or a rock mechanics textbook. This page is arithmetic, not a design.
How to use it
- Type the core run length and the piece lengths (commas, spaces or new lines). Measure along the centre line and leave out breaks made by drilling.
- Type Jn, Jr, Ja, Jw and SRF from the Q tables.
- Type the five RMR ratings and the orientation adjustment from the RMR tables.
- Compare: if RMR and Q disagree a lot, recheck the ratings, or fit your own A and B for the site.
- Download a CSV of the results, or a PNG, PDF or Word report.
Worked example (made-up numbers)
A 150 cm run with pieces 25, 8, 12, 4, 30, 6, 18, 9, 11, 3 and 14 cm: six pieces are 10 cm or longer, 110 cm in all, so RQD = 73.3 %; the 140 cm of core is a 93.3 % recovery.
With Jn = 9, Jr = 1.5, Ja = 2, Jw = 1 and SRF = 1: RQD/Jn = 8.15, Jr/Ja = 0.75, Jw/SRF = 1, so Q = 6.11.
Made-up RMR ratings 7 + 13 + 10 + 20 + 10 = 60, with a −5 orientation adjustment: RMR = 55. The correlation gives RMR 60.3 from Q (5.3 more than measured) and Q 3.39 from RMR. GSI from RMR89 (groundwater set to 15, dry) is 60, and from Q′ about 60.3.
Tips
- Log RQD for each run, not each hole: one average hides weak zones.
- Q spans about 0.001 to 1000, so compare it on a log scale.
- The RMR–Q correlations scatter widely; treat them as a check, not a conversion.
FAQ
Why are there no rating tables? The tables belong to their authors’ publications; please use them from the source. The page checks only simple limits (RQD 0 to 100 %, Jw at most 1, RMR at most 100).
Can I use RQD from a scanline or Jv? Yes: switch “RQD from” to a typed value.
Where the numbers come from
- Deere (1964), Deere and Deere (1988): rock quality designation, RQD = sum of sound core pieces 10 cm or longer ÷ run length × 100 (definition only).
- Barton, Lien and Lunde (1974), Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support, Rock Mechanics 6: the Q formula (the rating tables are not reproduced; use the published tables).
- Bieniawski (1989), Engineering Rock Mass Classifications, Wiley: RMR as the sum of five ratings and an orientation adjustment (tables not reproduced). Bieniawski (1976) for the correlation RMR = 9 ln Q + 44.
- Hoek, Kaiser and Bawden (1995), Support of Underground Excavations in Hard Rock: GSI ≈ RMR89′ − 5 and GSI ≈ 9 ln Q′ + 44.
- Example core run and ratings made up by fibub.
Standard scientific values, such as constants, atomic weights and melting points, are facts found in every textbook; we name where ours were checked. If you are an author or publisher and want a value, a credit or a table changed or removed, tell us and we will act quickly.
Last updated 2026-11-09.